4 ms·

Deolalikar’s Claim: One Year Later

• wccrawford 15y ago
  tl;dr - No update. WHY? Why post this?
  • tzs 15y ago
    It contains a lot of interesting information. I'd guess that is why it was posted.
  • bdr 15y ago
    Because there are interesting ideas. Not everything has to be news.
  • bumbledraven 15y ago
    I hadn't realized that Deolalikar's web page still claims the result (and explains that it is out to a journal for the standard refereeing process). That's fairly bold.
• astrodust 15y ago
  It will be hilarious if you can prove the answer to the P-NP problem can't be proven to be P or NP.