In his linked writings, it becomes clear that he’s not necessarily rejecting copyright, patents, and trademarks, but instead pointing out that generalizing thes

In his linked writings, it becomes clear that he’s not necessarily rejecting copyright, patents, and trademarks, but instead pointing out that generalizing these three things under the term “IP” distorts their legal meanings and histories. (He might reject aspects of these three things elsewhere, but that’s a different issue.)