> That's like saying condoms are ineffective because you included people too lazy to put them on in the first place in your calculations. I think it's closer t

> That's like saying condoms are ineffective because you included people too lazy to put them on in the first place in your calculations. I think it's closer to say that the existance of condoms won't make AIDS and unwanted pregnancies disappear, even if they were 100% effective. Which, if you're trying to eliminate completly AIDS, is a fair claim to make. My point is that you shouldn't assume that everyone is going to follow the Go guidelines, because some people won't, and you don't want your security to rely on that.