4 ms·
I've (probably?) found more linker vulnerabilities than anyone else, but don't really understand your argument. I definitely understand library search path vuln
by taviso 5y ago
I've (probably?) found more linker vulnerabilities than anyone else, but don't really understand your argument. I definitely understand library search path vulnerabilities (I've literally found bugs in $ORIGIN parsing, e.g. CVE-2010-3847 was one of mine!).
We think security updates don't break API/ABI because they're backported to all previous major versions that are still actively supported. This isn't "thoughts and prayers", it's work that the packagers and maintainers do. I can't tell you how useful being able to fix a vulnerability in every program is, just think of updating every application that uses libpng on your desktop, or every server application that uses OpenSSL.
I just can't imagine wanting to give that up, because of name mangling ABI issues!
- gnufx 5y agoI hope that puts it to rest; I can hope. Unfortunately, my experience is that people who haven't fixed multiple security problems, and probably have never heard of taviso, know a lot more about security than people who have...