3 ms·
Which part _did_ I understand and what part did I not, according to you?
by kreeben 5y ago
Which part _did_ I understand and what part did I not, according to you?
- anonymouswacker 5y agoSorry, I'm sometimes snarky in the mornings. Giving the OP the benefit of the doubt, I presume they meant that correlation does not always equal causation, but that there is a middle ground of the "unknown" rather than just the inverse of a logical, mathematical statement. If you see a pattern from enough correlations, then you might let go of some of your own hubris. It's not black and white, and so on.
- kreeben 5y agoI'm sorry you feel I've been too binary and full of hubris. I'll take that to heart. Cheers!