3 ms·
This is an entirely substance-free article. I'd recommend you save your time and not read it.
by torginus 5y ago
This is an entirely substance-free article. I'd recommend you save your time and not read it.
- johncoogan 5y agoAuthor here, what do you think would give this kind of content more substance? Still very new to this and genuinely looking for feedback!
- ethbr0 5y agoHN probably isn't the ideal audience for your article. Your content would be novel to someone who wasn't following Boom, but... that person isn't here. Because [0]. Parent could have put that more gently. That said, if you did want to target HN readership (which is non-representative of general readership!), you could drill down into each of your points. How is Boom doing these things? For example, their struggles to find a moderate-bypass engine (even uprated and recertified) without having to fund novel engine development is critical to the entire endeavor, and is still an open question [1]. In short, recommendation would be to (1) know your audience, (2) research prior art (previous HN Boom stories), and (3) bring something novel in your article, either through new reporting or synthesis. [0] https://hn.algolia.com/?q=boom https://hn.algolia.com/?q=boom [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boom_Overture#Engines https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boom_Overture#Engines