>You’re entire argued through the comments here seem to be that we should trust the government, current monitoring practices, existing limits, and the current s

>You’re entire argued through the comments here seem to be that we should trust the government, current monitoring practices, existing limits, and the current science. I have mentioned government once and even in that comment was in the context of comparing it to an entity which should not go unquestioned much less anything concerning regulations. That's a straw man. >This is a very fucking shaky foundation to base an argument. >We have every reason to be highly doubtful of all of those and to continue to seek more refined certainty. I have made zero arguments concerning any of this. I don't understand what you're getting to.