24 ms·
Yeah that’s a really wild take from the authors. Nobody knows what’s that 3.2M is, maybe the guy was in debt, or that was all he had. Sure he doesn’t sound like
by wellthisisgreat 5y ago
Yeah that’s a really wild take from the authors. Nobody knows what’s that 3.2M is, maybe the guy was in debt, or that was all he had. Sure he doesn’t sound like someone I’d ever want to work even next to, but to suggest that the founder is supposed to burn his personal net worth to the ground to pay off employees of a failed venture is disgustingly entitled and cannibalistic on the authors’ part.
I’d take no severance over some guy having to sacrifice his or his family’s livelihood so that he can provide 10 people with parachutes.
Another case totally of course if that mansion was bought with company funds. In that case it’s fraud and charges.