What it clearly demonstrates is that the CEO was far less invested in the company than those who worked for him. What the attempts at building a norm along the

What it clearly demonstrates is that the CEO was far less invested in the company than those who worked for him. What the attempts at building a norm along the lines of, "It isn't a crime, so people shouldn't talk about his finances" is about attempting to keep people from noticing that is almost always the case. It is class-defense, and what won't look good in future CEO interviews is that he was gauche-enough to draw attention to the difference between incentives-in-theory and the real world.