4 ms·
Agreed. And in those charts, a view of Firefox 8 puts the memory back up a bit. A quick look makes it feel like two steps forward, one step back.
by fredleblanc 15y ago
Agreed. And in those charts, a view of Firefox 8 puts the memory back up a bit. A quick look makes it feel like two steps forward, one step back.
- pohl 15y agohttp://blargon7.com/2011/07/endurance-tests-demonstrate-firefoxs-memory-usage-improvements/ http://blargon7.com/2011/07/endurance-tests-demonstrate-fire... Update: It appears that the explicit memory calculated for Firefox 7 on Mac was artificially low. This explains the slight increase in Firefox 8. If you’re interested you can read further details on Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673851 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673851