More useful is a bullshit metric. You seemed to take all of this as an attack against you personally, I assure you it was not, please calm down. No one said

More useful is a bullshit metric. You seemed to take all of this as an attack against you personally, I assure you it was not, please calm down. No one said there was a better source, only that Wikipedia is far from perfect. No specifics need be given Wikipedia when its a truism that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. Nevertheless here[1] is a page from Wikipedia about the reliability of Wikipedia. And since you are asking for specifics as if none exist, here[2] is an HN thread about issues with Wikipedia in which many examples and specifics are given. Now I, too, am done. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a.... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21699011 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21699011