4 ms·
Not many, but that's just PHY stuff. The threat model is really the barycenter of these targeted offensive security platforms. Adding support for new protocol
by jcims 5y ago
Not many, but that's just PHY stuff. The threat model is really the barycenter of these targeted offensive security platforms. Adding support for new protocols is generally trivial if there's an option, and a place to leverage them will tend to incentivize development when there isn't.
- lazide 5y ago“Just PHY stuff” is a pretty big barrier though isn’t it?
- dapids 5y agoNo, adding support for new protocols is far from trivial. There are so many factors that can make this non trivial such as encryption, channel hopping, DSS, hardware required, etc.
- jcims 5y agoI spent about eight years working alongside a software defined radio project. I saw the effect first hand. If you build an ecosystem in which folks with the appropriate skills can make a contribution, they tend to show up. The main challenge is licensing, not technical siphistication. Most of the protocols in question are quite a bit less complex than wifi or Bluetooth.