3 ms·
that word has some loaded baggage with it in the US. It's rarely used outside the context of it being coopted by the communist movement-- at least in the US. Co
by ineedasername 5y ago
that word has some loaded baggage with it in the US. It's rarely used outside the context of it being coopted by the communist movement-- at least in the US. Considering the multiple "red scares" in the US, the Palmer raids, etc... 100 years of history have linked the connotation in US usage as a reference to supporters of communism, stemming from a time when that support was also fairly closely linked with a Soviet Union very belligerent towards the US. Although it has been used more generically in the communist political scene without a linkage to (and with a criticism of) Soviet-style communism.
I highly doubt archive.org intended that association, it merely explains why a person would view it as an odd choice if words.
- tgsovlerkhgsel 5y agoNot just in the US. I wouldn't recommend using it in a non-ironic manner in the countries that experienced Soviet occupation either.