3 ms·
I would guess it's just a genetic glitch and not some conscious decision or purposeful design.
by _hilro 5y ago
I would guess it's just a genetic glitch and not some conscious decision or purposeful design.
- daveguy 5y agoIt doesn't have to be a conscious decision or purposeful design to be "there for a reason". Evolution tends toward solutions because the population that happens to be closer to a solution are more likely to survive. Nothing the op said was incompatible with evolution.
- alisonkisk 5y agoEvolution doesn't have "reasons" (pre hoc is random mutation) but it has "justifications" (post hoc is natural selection).
- samhw 5y agoIn addition to that, it's certainly not a 'glitch'. A genetic glitch would be a (possibly short-lived) mutation which is still in the 'beta' phase, so to speak, or else a harmful side effect of an otherwise beneficial mutation (e.g. albinism). This is a paradigmatic example of an ordinary useful mutation which persisted because it increased fitness.