5 ms·
> decades of car UX Truth to be told, it was stagnant for last 10 years: - adding more buttons increases user's fatigue and decreases feature discoverability.
by practice9 5y ago
> decades of car UX
Truth to be told, it was stagnant for last 10 years:
- adding more buttons increases user's fatigue and decreases feature discoverability. With cars getting more integrated into various software features, there is no going back from touch.
- no voice interaction UX or a very bad one
Perhaps several programmable buttons for advanced users would be nice. But that depends on whether user really needs those custom routines and actions.
- akavel 5y ago> it was stagnant for last 10 years Could it be because it was really good?
- nbzso 5y agoExactly. The product design marketing mantra of “move fast and break things” is a plague putting all proven knowledge behind in the name of innovation for the sake of innovation (or more in the lines of VC scam, dark patterns UX and customer exploitation ). Professional design thinking is data based and when data is proving use case stability outcomes, you improve with iterative steps and optimisation. Today UX/UI Design is treated as decoration and the main audiences are corporations or software developers. You can check MBUX as an example of clutter, complexity and bad taste visuals. Just another outsourced design job in the name of corporate profit over product design.
- kwhitefoot 5y agoNo, car UIs were and are mostly horrible.