4 ms·

do we need the USPS anymore?

bl4ckneon 5y ago
Do you still want mail? USPS is obligated to provide mail to every place in the USA no matter how far away or small the communities might be. So yes we still need them.
- dylan604 5y ago
  Honestly, I don't know that I really do want mail any more. It's pretty mind boggling that for <$1 I can send an envelope anywhere in the country in a matter of days. That's cool and all, but I can't think of the last time I even thought that would be necessary. Important bills are electronic now a days, and I haven't received a holiday/birthday card with $5 from relatives in decades. I frequently forget to even check the mail box, and when I do, it is filled with traditional junk mail and the random politician solicitations. Oh, and the random mail for previous residents at this address.
  - SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
    I think this is an extremely bubbled view of how mail works in the United States and the relative access of the internet. A good chunk of the United States doesn’t have reliable internet, but will have consistent mail service.
    - dylan604 5y ago
      The question posed: Do you still want mail? I responded no. You come back with some out of scope non-sense about thinking outside of me. That's not the question. If the question was "should the mail system be abolished", we can have the discussion you want, but maybe you should ask that question. The original question as actually posted followed with "yes we still need them".
      - op00to 5y ago
        Wow cute response.
        dylan604 5y ago
        I love when people ask me a question, and then someone tells me that's wrong because I had a different response than theirs. It's not a "what's your opinion" type of question. It was a simple yes/no question directly targeted to the reader. My no response in no way suggested that nobody else anywhere ever should no longer receive mail. The response I received was just trying too hard to twist things.
    - smallerfish 5y ago
      The problem is that rural USPS is _not_ reliable (source: have lived in multiple rural locations). USPS is reliable in cities. Internet is also reliable in cities. Most people have phones. For those who don't, alternate infrastructure that leverages the internet could easily exist, and would be way more efficient than the USPS network. Watch this get downvoted, because people really emotionally _care_ about USPS.
- KingMachiavelli 5y ago
  'Provide mail' can mean different things and its certainly not ever 'place'. It is very common in mountain towns to not have mailboxes at least not residential so you have to go to a post office 5-15 miles away. Meanwhile Fedex & UPS will deliver to your door. That said the USPS is certainly an essential service and probably does serve certain niche locations better than UPS & Fedex.
  - Symbiote 5y ago
    USPS charges the same, low (55¢) rate to send to these remote locations. FedEx won't tell me the cost without an account, but for UPS a domestic, ground letter (<1 lb) costs between $8.76 and $11.01, or $32+ for Alaska/Hawaii etc. Added to that, "remote areas" have a surcharge which is about $4 in the 48 states, $10 in Hawaii and $32 in Alaska. https://www.ups.com/assets/resources/media/en_US/daily_rates.pdf https://www.ups.com/assets/resources/media/en_US/daily_rates... https://www.ups.com/gb/en/shipping/zones-and-rates/area-surcharge.page https://www.ups.com/gb/en/shipping/zones-and-rates/area-surc...
op00to 5y ago
How would we deliver absentee ballots without a postal service?
- satronaut 5y ago
  you'd go to the polling location and vote
  - kube-system 5y ago
    This would disenfranchise many disabled and those who must travel for work.
  - gnarbarian 5y ago
    but that would disenfranchise all The illegal votes.
  - hakfoo 5y ago
    My grandmother passed a few months ago, after a nearly year-long illness that left her bed-bound. There was no way she was getting in the car, load her into a wheelchair or gurney or something, then sit in a queue, in the middle of a pandemic, to vote. But she sure as hell was able to exercise her civil rights at home.
    - satronaut 5y ago
      So somebody like her would have a very valid excuse to vote my mail (and could send it via FedEx or ups), but an able bodied person should walk to the polling place, show their ID, and vote. You get 4 hours off by law to vote
      - op00to 5y ago
        Uh no I don’t.
satronaut 5y ago
not really. Everything they offer, private industry offers a better version of. Who sends letters? Email is way faster and cheaper Sending a package? Amazon, ups, or fedex Need a passport? USPS shouldn't handle this, since they're so incompetent at handling passport applications
- kube-system 5y ago
  Private couriers have no obligations to provide service to anyone. One of the important things about the USPS is that they have an obligation to support the continued operation of basic public services, and they’re organizationally held accountable through their governance structure. Public services that our government provides are done so without regards to people’s ability to use email, electronic banking, or drive to the nearest FedEx/UPS store in the closest city.
smallerfish 5y ago
It's amazing how passionate some people are about the mail service. Any question like this _will_ get downvoted. I always hated USPS when I lived in the US. Service at the post office was usually terrible, clerks were clearly coasting on the fact that they were hard to fire (customer service was poor), and delivery rates were hit and miss (whereas somehow the private carriers always managed to delivery.) Now I live in a country with no mail service. It's fine. I do everything online. If I need to order something, I pick it up from the DHL store in town. The one time that something was sent via certified delivery, a motorcycle messenger delivered it.

Do you still want mail? USPS is obligated to provide mail to every place in the USA no matter how far away or small the communities might be. So yes we still need them.

dylan604 5y ago
Honestly, I don't know that I really do want mail any more. It's pretty mind boggling that for <$1 I can send an envelope anywhere in the country in a matter of days. That's cool and all, but I can't think of the last time I even thought that would be necessary. Important bills are electronic now a days, and I haven't received a holiday/birthday card with $5 from relatives in decades. I frequently forget to even check the mail box, and when I do, it is filled with traditional junk mail and the random politician solicitations. Oh, and the random mail for previous residents at this address.
- SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
  I think this is an extremely bubbled view of how mail works in the United States and the relative access of the internet. A good chunk of the United States doesn’t have reliable internet, but will have consistent mail service.
  - dylan604 5y ago
    The question posed: Do you still want mail? I responded no. You come back with some out of scope non-sense about thinking outside of me. That's not the question. If the question was "should the mail system be abolished", we can have the discussion you want, but maybe you should ask that question. The original question as actually posted followed with "yes we still need them".
    - op00to 5y ago
      Wow cute response.
      - dylan604 5y ago
        I love when people ask me a question, and then someone tells me that's wrong because I had a different response than theirs. It's not a "what's your opinion" type of question. It was a simple yes/no question directly targeted to the reader. My no response in no way suggested that nobody else anywhere ever should no longer receive mail. The response I received was just trying too hard to twist things.
  - smallerfish 5y ago
    The problem is that rural USPS is _not_ reliable (source: have lived in multiple rural locations). USPS is reliable in cities. Internet is also reliable in cities. Most people have phones. For those who don't, alternate infrastructure that leverages the internet could easily exist, and would be way more efficient than the USPS network. Watch this get downvoted, because people really emotionally _care_ about USPS.
KingMachiavelli 5y ago
'Provide mail' can mean different things and its certainly not ever 'place'. It is very common in mountain towns to not have mailboxes at least not residential so you have to go to a post office 5-15 miles away. Meanwhile Fedex & UPS will deliver to your door. That said the USPS is certainly an essential service and probably does serve certain niche locations better than UPS & Fedex.
- Symbiote 5y ago
  USPS charges the same, low (55¢) rate to send to these remote locations. FedEx won't tell me the cost without an account, but for UPS a domestic, ground letter (<1 lb) costs between $8.76 and $11.01, or $32+ for Alaska/Hawaii etc. Added to that, "remote areas" have a surcharge which is about $4 in the 48 states, $10 in Hawaii and $32 in Alaska. https://www.ups.com/assets/resources/media/en_US/daily_rates.pdf https://www.ups.com/assets/resources/media/en_US/daily_rates... https://www.ups.com/gb/en/shipping/zones-and-rates/area-surcharge.page https://www.ups.com/gb/en/shipping/zones-and-rates/area-surc...

op00to 5y ago

How would we deliver absentee ballots without a postal service?

satronaut 5y ago
you'd go to the polling location and vote
- kube-system 5y ago
  This would disenfranchise many disabled and those who must travel for work.
- gnarbarian 5y ago
  but that would disenfranchise all The illegal votes.
- hakfoo 5y ago
  My grandmother passed a few months ago, after a nearly year-long illness that left her bed-bound. There was no way she was getting in the car, load her into a wheelchair or gurney or something, then sit in a queue, in the middle of a pandemic, to vote. But she sure as hell was able to exercise her civil rights at home.
  - satronaut 5y ago
    So somebody like her would have a very valid excuse to vote my mail (and could send it via FedEx or ups), but an able bodied person should walk to the polling place, show their ID, and vote. You get 4 hours off by law to vote
    - op00to 5y ago
      Uh no I don’t.

satronaut 5y ago

not really. Everything they offer, private industry offers a better version of. Who sends letters? Email is way faster and cheaper Sending a package? Amazon, ups, or fedex Need a passport? USPS shouldn't handle this, since they're so incompetent at handling passport applications

kube-system 5y ago
Private couriers have no obligations to provide service to anyone. One of the important things about the USPS is that they have an obligation to support the continued operation of basic public services, and they’re organizationally held accountable through their governance structure. Public services that our government provides are done so without regards to people’s ability to use email, electronic banking, or drive to the nearest FedEx/UPS store in the closest city.

smallerfish 5y ago

It's amazing how passionate some people are about the mail service. Any question like this _will_ get downvoted. I always hated USPS when I lived in the US. Service at the post office was usually terrible, clerks were clearly coasting on the fact that they were hard to fire (customer service was poor), and delivery rates were hit and miss (whereas somehow the private carriers always managed to delivery.) Now I live in a country with no mail service. It's fine. I do everything online. If I need to order something, I pick it up from the DHL store in town. The one time that something was sent via certified delivery, a motorcycle messenger delivered it.