I think it would have been better to label everything that DHCPv6 covers with an entirely new name. Its functionality is fine for what it’s tasked to do, and mu

I think it would have been better to label everything that DHCPv6 covers with an entirely new name. Its functionality is fine for what it’s tasked to do, and much of the confusion I’d argue stems from those who (think they) know IPv4 trying to map their understanding to IPv6 unmodified.