> If you don't have diversity at scale, in so many senses of the word, your [sic] doomed to fail anyway. Then why do we need a law banning it? If these white-m

> If you don't have diversity at scale, in so many senses of the word, your [sic] doomed to fail anyway. Then why do we need a law banning it? If these white-male-only-board-led companies are doomed to fail, they should be outcompeted by sufficiently-diverse-board-led companies. I have a feeling the physical attributes of the board doesn't actually matter when it comes to a company's performance.