4 ms·
They still lose a (very) competent candidate, and that candidate will do great work elsewhere (and not for the board)
by kovek 5y ago
They still lose a (very) competent candidate, and that candidate will do great work elsewhere (and not for the board)
- ivalm 5y agoIf you have a fixed headcount, then forgoing one candidate for equivalent another doesn’t carry a cost. By hiring person A you would be missing out on person B, by hiring person B you would be missing out on A. The point is that the net cost is 0. So if B brings more diversity then A you should hire B. You are not (net) missing anything.