4 ms·
> What a shockingly sad interpretation from most (all at the time of writing) comments here. It's shockingly sad to see people defending state discrimination b
by sanity31415 5y ago
> What a shockingly sad interpretation from most (all at the time of writing) comments here.
It's shockingly sad to see people defending state discrimination based on race and sex.
- BrianOnHN 5y agoHow so? If the state continues to allow a small subset of the population to discriminate based on race and sex, isn't that also the state defending discrimination?
- sanity31415 5y ago> If the state continues to allow a small subset of the population to discriminate based on race and sex Example?
- waterhouse 5y agoI think discriminating based on race and sex (for hiring decisions) is already illegal. Therefore, the only new scenarios covered by this law are where a board ends up being single-sexed and -raced for reasons that one can't make a strong case were due to discrimination.