3 ms·
I was also troubled by this. In the CBS story, Ms. Abrams calls the other 20 people incredibly brave. Uh. No. If they were brave, they would quit and make their
by xhkkffbf 5y ago
I was also troubled by this. In the CBS story, Ms. Abrams calls the other 20 people incredibly brave. Uh. No. If they were brave, they would quit and make their claims publicly.
They clearly want to keep cashing that paycheck while being involved in an organization that they find reprehensible.
- gamblor956 5y agoMany of them did quit. They chose to stay anonymous because they didn't want to get blacklisted in an industry controlled by 3 petulant billionaires with a history of suing their critics. (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/blue-origin-alexandra-abrams-safety-workplace-culture/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=133949895 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/blue-origin-alexandra-abrams-sa...)
- xhkkffbf 5y agoThat's still not particularly brave, is it? If they have real concerns about engineering flaws that could even kill someone, they really should be going to the FAA, not writing a letter with someone who was fired two years ago. The FAA is quite capable of granting someone anonymity. My impression is that this is really the work of someone who is still angry enough to dredge up problems from two years ago. The CBS reporter could only interview 5 of the 20 after granting them all anonymity. So why aren't the 15 at least willing to speak to a reporter?