Not really, because there is still no utility in owning the rights to an NFT. I've only ever seen two kinds of interest expressed in NFTs. The first is immens

Not really, because there is still no utility in owning the rights to an NFT. I've only ever seen two kinds of interest expressed in NFTs. The first is immensely wealthy people who are looking for a trendy way to flaunt their wealth, because they've exhausted all traditional options. This is what leads someone to pay $3M to "own" the first tweet. The second is people who aren't immensely wealthy but are hoping they will become so by buying/minting an NFT and selling it for an huge profit, presumably to someone from the first group (or a sucker from the second). This makes up the majority of NFTs by volume, and is where the pyramid scheme similarities become hard to dismiss. Haven't seen anything resembling a third kind of interest that, under scrutiny, doesn't ultimately fall into one of these two groups.