I wish scrum had some support for decision making, where you'd attempt to evaluate suggested solutions based on the actual goals of the team/company, have healt

I wish scrum had some support for decision making, where you'd attempt to evaluate suggested solutions based on the actual goals of the team/company, have healthy moderated debates, and in the end (by voting or manager) make a decision which is then documented, with a note on when it can be revisited the earliest. Scrum just pretends that there are no decisions to be made, or if there is, that they are obviously simple and that everyone spontaneously just get along. In reality there are a lot of pretty damn important decisions to be made in developing and evolving software, and people have widely different ideas, and smart people are usually very stubborn as well. I had a guy insist that a build script for a React app should absolutely be written in Ant. And nothing else. I argued with him that it's highly unusual, and that shell script or Makefile would be a better choice, pleaded with the rest of the team etc. It was massively exhausting for me and the whole team, this went on almost a whole week, and when I finally got my way on this issue, he just rage quit the team and transferred to another. I just wish there was a manager who would be "the bad guy" and make decisions like this like the old fashioned way, it's not without benefits. And similar incidents happen to me all the time, whenever I use SQL to solve something, use the command line, or when I simplify some code, I always get attacked by (mostly) juniors. I just don't understand how to contribute as a senior when you have no decision power and no impact, and every decision is made in an undefined way (in reality by exhausting arguing).