4 ms·
Between ISO, UN CEFACT/OASIS, the now irrelevant/repivoted OMG, etc it isn’t like the idea is a new one or that anything isn’t written down - there are formal s
by danachow 5y ago
Between ISO, UN CEFACT/OASIS, the now irrelevant/repivoted OMG, etc it isn’t like the idea is a new one or that anything isn’t written down - there are formal standards (insert xkcd here). The incentives for widespread adoption are just not there.
- nerdponx 5y agoMaybe the problem is too much generality? An industry-specific ontology seems a lot more tractable than a general purpose ontology for all industries.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jmole 5y agoAnd cost - most standards organizations charge money for implementations and for training. I find it no coincidence that the most widely implemented standards are the ones that you can learn about and implement for free.