4 ms·
This article has mostly ad-hominems but this twitter thread has links to twitter threads (gotta love twitter) that actually have some factual criticisms, obviou
by yread 5y ago
This article has mostly ad-hominems but this twitter thread has links to twitter threads (gotta love twitter) that actually have some factual criticisms, obvious photoshopped images (perhaps crops, but it still should be declared)
https://twitter.com/FlintDibble/status/1440383400443977728 https://twitter.com/FlintDibble/status/1440383400443977728
for example
https://twitter.com/ChrisStantis/status/1440404380386160646 https://twitter.com/ChrisStantis/status/1440404380386160646
- KuiN 5y agoBest visualisation of the Photoshopping of some of the images used in the article: https://twitter.com/AsteroidDave/status/1443774300532600832 https://twitter.com/AsteroidDave/status/1443774300532600832 They appear to have taken images that had previously been published and for whatever reason, modified the sand around the remains.