2 ms·
Exactly what I was trying to get across. The protected term is meaningless even if enforced, it seems to me, because there are no "reserved tasks," as you say.
by agentultra 5y ago
Exactly what I was trying to get across. The protected term is meaningless even if enforced, it seems to me, because there are no "reserved tasks," as you say.
It's bit like... being able to practice law as long as you don't call yourself a lawyer. You're a legal assistant instead. In a similar fashion developers are practising software engineering without calling themselves, "engineers."
I don't think we all need to be licensed in order to work -- but companies should be required to hire X number of licensed engineers per Y number of developers. They should be required to pay for the liability insurance to hire those licensed engineers. And there should be repercussions if the company goes against the engineers' direction.
- auxym 5y agoFor what it's worth, the latest revision of the Engineers Act in Quebec (2020, the previous revision was from 1962), has a much wider definition of engineering works and reserved acts, which does include software, if it can have an impact on the safety of persons. I am not a lawyer (mech engineer), but that's the message that the OIQ has been sending lately. It's unclear when and how they plan to start applying these new regulations.