5 ms·
What this would mean is that insiders with large holdings of stock (due to e.g. grants) would be forced to quit their jobs just so they could have some liquidit
by aqme28 5y ago
What this would mean is that insiders with large holdings of stock (due to e.g. grants) would be forced to quit their jobs just so they could have some liquidity.
That's a terrible incentive.
- sidlls 5y agoMost, if not all, insiders shouldn't be in a situation where they need that kind of liquidity in their company shares. I'd argue that if they are their incentives aren't aligned with their role as an insider and they should be removed anyway.