4 ms·
I agree that it's disappointing that the article didn't mention reddit, but the compete.com data doesn't exactly support the notion of digg users flocking there
by storborg 15y ago
I agree that it's disappointing that the article didn't mention reddit, but the compete.com data doesn't exactly support the notion of digg users flocking there:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/delicious.com+digg.com+reddit.com/ http://siteanalytics.compete.com/delicious.com+digg.com+redd...
- starwed 15y agoSee my other post: reddit, quite some time, had a blog post about how such analytics seemed to be completely detached from the reality of their internal numbers.
- cbs 15y agoReddit's google analytics (Jan '11) puts their number of uniques >10x higher than compete and their Jun/Jul number is around 8x larger than compete's. I guess thats what you for looking at a website that pretends a 1% sample is representative of actual Internet usage for anything beyond painting the most board strokes.