3 ms·
The only institution that acted against him were the private corporations he was moonlighting with. UCLA, the entity he is suing, reinstated him without any co
by addicted 5y ago
The only institution that acted against him were the private corporations he was moonlighting with.
UCLA, the entity he is suing, reinstated him without any consequences within 3 weeks.
I’ve personally been suspended for a lot less (actually, for being the victim) in a college setting.
- jollybean 5y ago"The only institution that acted against him " UCLA acted against him - by irresponsibility suspending him for issues regarding supposed racial insensitivity, which were without merit. His suspension caused him to lose revenue, hence the problem. The suspension could be a form of libel i.e. false information published about him, causing him damages. I should add that it's obviously more complicated if he's 'cleared' of something but the libelous damanges linger anyhow.