4 ms·

> They can and do manage commercial and IP rights, artist royalties [...] and assure the authenticity and provenance They literally do nothing of the sort. An

> They can and do manage commercial and IP rights, artist royalties [...] and assure the authenticity and provenance They literally do nothing of the sort. An NFT has no capability to restrict or monetize the usage of the work it is linked to, nor does its existence prove anything about the origin or authenticity of the work it is attached to. These are myths with no basis in fact. By way of example -- I could, if I wished to, create a NFT associated with a public-domain photograph of the Mona Lisa, and assign that NFT to myself. This doesn't give me any capability to manage rights to that image, nor should it assure anyone that I painted it.

neuralzen 5y ago
Perhaps you can email Universal Talent Agency and tell them they are wrong. Trademarks and copyright infringement exists in the NFT world, just because you can mint an NFT doesn't mean you own the art associated, particularly if you didn't create it. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/uta-cryptopunks-nft-film-tv-vieo-games-1235005392/ https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/uta-crypt... https://meebits.larvalabs.com/meebits/termsandconditions https://meebits.larvalabs.com/meebits/termsandconditions
- duskwuff 5y ago
  > Perhaps you can email Universal Talent Agency and tell them they are wrong. About what? If anything, this goes to prove my point. These NFTs cannot "manage commercial and IP rights" to themselves, so Larva Labs has contracted with UTA to perform that task. > Trademarks and copyright infringement exists in the NFT world, just because you can mint an NFT doesn't mean you own the art associated, particularly if you didn't create it. Yes. Again, that's exactly the point I was making -- that a NFT does not "assure the authenticity and provenance" of anything.
  - neuralzen 5y ago
    Alright, it is a fair point that it isn't a closed system, but you have to start from somewhere in order to grow from there into something with more of a closed loop. At the end of the day, courts of law have to decide on the outcomes of contentions, and this holds true with traditional crypto as well. - Perhaps one day we'll see smart contracts which are honored by courts to uphold the contracts in a lawful way, if written in a specific way (like what Agrello is/was trying to do...dunno if they are still around), but it has to be built first, it can't be perfect day one out the door, it's a journey.

neuralzen 5y ago

Perhaps you can email Universal Talent Agency and tell them they are wrong. Trademarks and copyright infringement exists in the NFT world, just because you can mint an NFT doesn't mean you own the art associated, particularly if you didn't create it. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/uta-cryptopunks-nft-film-tv-vieo-games-1235005392/ https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/uta-crypt... https://meebits.larvalabs.com/meebits/termsandconditions https://meebits.larvalabs.com/meebits/termsandconditions

duskwuff 5y ago
> Perhaps you can email Universal Talent Agency and tell them they are wrong. About what? If anything, this goes to prove my point. These NFTs cannot "manage commercial and IP rights" to themselves, so Larva Labs has contracted with UTA to perform that task. > Trademarks and copyright infringement exists in the NFT world, just because you can mint an NFT doesn't mean you own the art associated, particularly if you didn't create it. Yes. Again, that's exactly the point I was making -- that a NFT does not "assure the authenticity and provenance" of anything.
- neuralzen 5y ago
  Alright, it is a fair point that it isn't a closed system, but you have to start from somewhere in order to grow from there into something with more of a closed loop. At the end of the day, courts of law have to decide on the outcomes of contentions, and this holds true with traditional crypto as well. - Perhaps one day we'll see smart contracts which are honored by courts to uphold the contracts in a lawful way, if written in a specific way (like what Agrello is/was trying to do...dunno if they are still around), but it has to be built first, it can't be perfect day one out the door, it's a journey.