3 ms·
Why should a worker accept a smaller cut for a feature the whole team contributed to? Did they write less code or contribute less bug fixes? Is the pay based
by chmsky00 5y ago
Why should a worker accept a smaller cut for a feature the whole team contributed to?
Did they write less code or contribute less bug fixes?
Is the pay based upon output or businesses ability to manufacture consent in workers?
Americans are battered spouses who would be wise to force austerity on CEOs rather than the other way around. Indeed, look at the wins teacher strikes and workers sitting at home right now, have on wages and competition.
They need workers (when humans believed in religion as our social temple they were called “flocks”).
We’re filling in the area of a perimeter originally defined by Bible thumpers and dead men of a classist perspective. Workers build the world.
Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed uses a forced importation metaphor, of high minded aristocratic/imperialist expectations on locals. It’s one of my favorites to point folks at.
- RC_ITR 5y ago> Why should a worker accept a smaller cut for a feature the whole team contributed to? It’s simple. They don’t have to, but then when someone in Bali will do the same work for less, why wouldn’t the company mix shift that way over time?
- chmsky00 5y agoAnd the people left behind won’t need to eat or have shelter? How will that bank enforce ownership from across the country if they take away the economy? We’re basically setting aside biology for biblical trade rules foisted on ignorant farmers by aristocrats. Wow humanity is this ignorant of itself. I am mesmerized.