9 ms·
Ya, will get scrubbed for via device locations though I’m sure.
by dogman144 5y ago
Ya, will get scrubbed for via device locations though I’m sure.
- conductr 5y agoI’m sure there are plenty of solves for that for those motivated? VPN? Remote desktop?
- lotsofpulp 5y agoCan states not subpoena mobile networks for people’s location histories? Seems kind of stupid to commit tax evasion with no chance of plausible deniability. For the bottom 80% or even 90% of people it seems like the rewards are only a few thousand dollars per year. And the remaining 10% to 20% are easy for authorities to identify.
- conductr 5y agoI’m absolutely sure they could but, being devil’s advocate here, would they? What is going to tip them off? I feel extremely low chances this comes up in an audit The tax comment was only a secondary point that i agree is quite stupid and obviously illegal. But I never underestimate how much people hate paying taxes and the lengths they go through to avoid them.
- lotsofpulp 5y agoA couple years ago, Connecticut got records of all the Newegg purchases in the previous 5 years or something that had shipped to Connecticut, and mailed everyone a bill for use tax they evaded. https://www.techspot.com/news/73582-newegg-customers-connecticut-receiving-tax-bills-past-purchases.html https://www.techspot.com/news/73582-newegg-customers-connect... All I know is if you are trying to evade taxes, you might want to do it with some plausible deniability. When tax receipts come up short, they are going to come after someone, and many things are a few seconds worth of search query away in a database.
- dogman144 5y agoAll work is tied to a corporate user name and a managed device. VPN -> why is a private VPN on a work computer, further investigation (assuming you could even download it onto a PwC comp) etc