>Ok, so why does it matter if it's a "drug" and not a "vaccine"? Because they keep calling people who want to take the drug "anti-vaxxers" lumping them in with

>Ok, so why does it matter if it's a "drug" and not a "vaccine"? Because they keep calling people who want to take the drug "anti-vaxxers" lumping them in with people who are against vaccines. I'm not anti-vaxxer, so it's a lie to call me one. I also am not interested in taking the anti-COVID drug. Not wanting to take the new, barely tested, anti-COVID drug does not make me an anti-vaxxer even if you change the definition of vaccine to include the anti-COVID drug. >You're just being contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. As they say, don't make a mountain out of a mole hill. No, I am not. People have died, and had their health permanently degraded from this anti-COVID drug. I'm weighing the risks of that against COVID. I'm at very low risk of serious illness from COVID, and unknown risk from the anti-COVID drug. So I'm not taking the drug. It's not "contrarian" and it's not "making a mountain out of a molehill" it's my body, my choice. I thing vaccines are amazing and I look forward to new ones. The anti-covid drug isn't one. It's that simple.