2 ms·
I'm going to vote twice: 1) ECMAScript, for being excrutiatingly detailed. Guy Steele did a wonderful job shoehorning an unambiguous specification around a lo
by colanderman 15y ago
I'm going to vote twice:
1) ECMAScript, for being excrutiatingly detailed. Guy Steele did a wonderful job shoehorning an unambiguous specification around a loopy language.
2) PostgreSQL. While not particularly mathematical, Postgres docs do a good job of "covering all the bases"... potential "gotchas" and incompatibilities are always documented, and I never find myself wondering what a particular feature does.