> that supports burying proprietary firmware in non-introspectable read-only memory because then they can "pretend it's hardware", then selling the result as "f

> that supports burying proprietary firmware in non-introspectable read-only memory because then they can "pretend it's hardware", then selling the result as "fully libre" (even though the same device with the same firmware visible and accessible to the user would be much more free and transparent, allowing introspection, auditing, and replacement with a free alternative); Totally agree, they have been completely swallowed by their own ideology. This shows that their actions are contradicting the same things FSF says publicly: that reverse-engineering is important.