4 ms·
I'm not convinced that a web-based solution can "not suck" more than Transmit already doesn't (does?). Transmit mounts a drive on my desktop and I just use it l
by natesm 15y ago
I'm not convinced that a web-based solution can "not suck" more than Transmit already doesn't (does?). Transmit mounts a drive on my desktop and I just use it like a drive. It stores my accounts in the keychain, which I much prefer to storing them in a decryptable format somewhere in "The Cloud". The experience is native and I don't believe a browser based experience is going to come close.
...except for the fact that I can access it anywhere if it's in a browser, I guess. Personally, I use Transmit with S3, so that's not an issue, but I suppose it could be for a privately owned server.
- sxates 15y agoA native app is in the roadmap. What 1FTP does that no other FTP apps do is allow you to share access with others without giving them direct access to the server. It's great for temporary contractors, or even employees who may quit at some point. You can simply 'unshare' access.
- natesm 15y agoOk, that makes a lot of sense. It's not a situation that applies to me, but I can certainly see the appeal. Best of luck (assuming you're Brain Scates).