4 ms·
It's not part of the original spec for Markdown, but it looks like it's a relatively standard addition to Markdown: https://www.markdownguide.org/extended-synt
by zlsa 5y ago
It's not part of the original spec for Markdown, but it looks like it's a relatively standard addition to Markdown:
https://www.markdownguide.org/extended-syntax/#footnotes https://www.markdownguide.org/extended-syntax/#footnotes
- sandyarmstrong 5y agoBut do note it's not part of CommonMark yet: https://spec.commonmark.org/current/ https://spec.commonmark.org/current/ I hope it gets there. I like this feature. :-)
- eevilspock 5y agoMake your desire known on the CommonMark forum topic on this: https://talk.commonmark.org/t/footnotes-now-supported-by-githubs-web-interface/3983?u=vas https://talk.commonmark.org/t/footnotes-now-supported-by-git...
- chrysoprace 5y agoI think CommonMark misses the mark (pardon the pun) by not having tables as part of the spec. Mind you, GFM tables leave much to be desired, but I'm constantly writing tables in my notes and it's frustrating to not see this supported in CommonMark.