This seems wrong, if there's two models that could be consistent with immunization it's: - Immunization reduces infection risk and severity of breakthrough -

This seems wrong, if there's two models that could be consistent with immunization it's: - Immunization reduces infection risk and severity of breakthrough - Immunization reduces infection risk but, once infected, severity risk is the same as an unvaccinated person Both mean you should get vaccinated but the latter means you should be more risk-on if you are vaccinated. The people downvoting me and arguing with me in this thread don't realize that the latter theory, if true, is actually one which leads to more conservative risk taking.