4 ms·
The solution for that is review by a smart person who is empowered to consider the context and use her professional judgement, not a static set of criteria.
by closeparen 5y ago
The solution for that is review by a smart person who is empowered to consider the context and use her professional judgement, not a static set of criteria.
- photochemsyn 5y agoUnfortunately, a 'smart person' in the employ of one industry might not agree with a 'smart person' in the employ of another industry. For example, consider two smart Wikipedia editors working on the climate change and global warming pages... one from the fossil fuel sector, one from the renewable energy sector.
- closeparen 5y agoThe sensibilities of your gatekeepers are your organization’s culture. If you don’t like them, you have a deeper problem which rules aren’t going to fix.
- someguydave 5y agoPrecisely, rules are implemented by people, and people are often idiots.
- vkk8 5y ago1) Such smart person might not even exist 2) If she exists, and is as smart as she should be, she will realize quite quickly that her power can be used for personal gain and she will become corrupted. Power corrupts, etc. and you can't really entertain any kind of organizational solution without considering game theory of the situation.