3 ms·
Well at that age he would have passed on his genetic material already. The point of the Darwin “award” is to praise genetically unfit people who die before repr
by supperburg 5y ago
Well at that age he would have passed on his genetic material already. The point of the Darwin “award” is to praise genetically unfit people who die before reproducing, thus improving the fitness of the species and pushing evolution forward. So no, he doesn’t get a Darwin Award.
- mumblemumble 5y agoFrom the Darwin Awards' official rules: > The existence of offspring, though potentially deleterious to the gene pool, does not disqualify a nominee. . . [E]ach nominee is judged based on whether or not she has removed her own genes, without consideration to the number of offspring or, in the case of an elderly winner, the likelihood of producing more offspring. https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules1.html https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules1.html
- supperburg 5y agoThat’s hilarious. I think Darwin would disagree though.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]