6 ms·
I used to be a huge sceptic of this cycle of deep learning. But not anymore. GANs are incredible and there's a huge amount of low hanging fruit left to pluck. I
by hwers 5y ago
I used to be a huge sceptic of this cycle of deep learning. But not anymore. GANs are incredible and there's a huge amount of low hanging fruit left to pluck. I definitely don't believe AI will repeat it's history (history doesn't have to cycle).
- bilater 5y agoCan you elaborate on some of the use cases of GANs? I'm particularly interested in generative content but the output has been pretty meh so far.
- hwers 5y agoYeah I was totally anti hype when everyone was excited about style transfer and stuff like that. I found most of the VQGAN+CLIP way overhyped (sure it's abstract and funky but you get bored of that look after 10 images - it's like that deep dream filter from 5 years ago, shouldn't we have progressed more by now) but lately CLIP guided diffusion has blown me away. I literally thought it was all deception and cherry picking until I tried it myself[1] and realized the amazing outputs from https://twitter.com/RiversHaveWings https://twitter.com/RiversHaveWings are real. [1] https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1QBsaDAZv8np29FPbvjffbE1eytoJcsgA https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1QBsaDAZv8np29FPbvjf...
- user_named 5y agoWhat do you mean by real? The images clearly exist because you can see them.
- kragen 5y agoThey mean "not cherry-picked or otherwise faked"; that is, that the images shown on that Twitter account are really typical of the images produced by CLIP guided diffusion, not, say, hand-painted.
- bilater 5y agoYeah it's cool but I agree it's still not quite mind blowing or even very useful. Same with GPT-3. Hopefully we get there soon.