4 ms·
They aren’t permitted to delete reports, even non-credible ones. It would also likely cost far in excess of $1M to investigate these. It is a clever trick thou
by manwe150 5y ago
They aren’t permitted to delete reports, even non-credible ones.
It would also likely cost far in excess of $1M to investigate these. It is a clever trick though, because it sounds like a big bounty, while being actually a joke amount (he’s proposing spending far less $10 per person to investigate their medical records or autopsy). And seems possibly in bad-faith too, as he seems to be rejecting the population statistical data that already seem to refute his claims.
Advocating for identification of high-risk groups is another good smoke-screen since he’s saying nothing new, but making it sound like he’s smart and aware. Yes, there are people who need to talk to their doctor about risks, but the overwhelming majority of people aren’t in that group, but are made needlessly worried by such rhetorical tricks.
- walterbell 5y agoI can't be certain what he meant, but it seemed that the bounty was for an analysis that was comparable to those in his paper, not a full forensic review of each entry in VAERS. An actual investigation could only be done by CDC, who have access to non-VAERS reports and other health surveillance infrastructure. A handful of independent autopsies have been done, they are expensive.