4 ms·

The vaccines are incredibly effective in the people who need it the most.

incrudible 5y ago
The vaccine response is directly proportional to immune system function. It is not as strong[1] in older people, who are also most at risk from the disease. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03739-1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03739-1 This isn't mutually exclusive with the vaccine being effective. However, we're heading towards less than 70% effectiveness (95% with fresh booster) against severe cases in the older age groups[2]. These cases add up. [2] https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/israeli-data-how-can-efficacy-vs-severe-disease-be-strong-when-60-of-hospitalized-are-vaccinated https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/israeli-data-how-can-...
- shapefrog 5y ago
  > The vaccines are not that effective > They are 70% effective / 95% effective. Pick a lane?
  - incrudible 5y ago
    These are age cohort averages. If you die of COVID despite being vaccinated, clearly the vaccine was 0% effective and early treatment could possibly have helped. Either way, 70% is not incredible in my book. The 95% from the booster will not last.
    - shapefrog 5y ago
      You are confusing the outcomes of 'serious illness' - which you presented numbers for, and 'death'. Yes you are correct to say if something is effective 999,999 in a million, it is 0% effective in the 1 person. As you specifically mention deaths, but present no information regarding it here is the UK data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween2januaryand2july2021 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsde... All cohorts: 51,281 total covid deaths in the 6 months Jan - July 2021. 640 of which had 2 doses of a vaccine.
      - incrudible 5y ago
        You picked a source that not age-stratified and also looks at a timeframe when many were not vaccinated in the first place. I can give you a source for deaths in the past few weeks in Israel, but only stratified between over/under 60: https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/what-do-new-israeli-data-say-about-effect-of-vaccines-boosters-vs-death-critical-severe-disease https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/what-do-new-israeli-d... The picture is similar: Efficacy of around 70% (two doses) and 95% (fresh booster) against death. This is far from "one in a million". If you age-stratified this data further, you would likely get better efficacy though.
        shapefrog 5y ago
        Assume for the purpose every single one of the ~600 is old. Same outcome. Indeed leaving them in, according to your own source makes vaccines look worse than they are! Given how the large sample size etc is I am more than comfortable taking the UK unstratified data and clncluding the vaccines are effective. > Because of age confounding, it is crucial to stratify by age groups, and further to remove children from the <60yr group; otherwise Simpson's paradox makes vaccines look like they are not effective in protecting against COVID-19 deaths at all.
        incrudible 5y ago
        No matter how you twist and turn it, the vaccines are significantly less effective in the people who need it the most, to the point where a significant amount of deaths, in both absolue and relative terms, occur in the fully vaccinated. That means better options for treatment are still needed. That is the point I am making, nothing else.
        shapefrog 5y ago
        You are litterally making shit up by saying a significant amount of deaths, in both absolue and relative terms, occur in the fully vaccinated Best of luck to you on your propaganda campaign.

The vaccine response is directly proportional to immune system function. It is not as strong[1] in older people, who are also most at risk from the disease. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03739-1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03739-1 This isn't mutually exclusive with the vaccine being effective. However, we're heading towards less than 70% effectiveness (95% with fresh booster) against severe cases in the older age groups[2]. These cases add up. [2] https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/israeli-data-how-can-efficacy-vs-severe-disease-be-strong-when-60-of-hospitalized-are-vaccinated https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/israeli-data-how-can-...

shapefrog 5y ago
> The vaccines are not that effective > They are 70% effective / 95% effective. Pick a lane?
- incrudible 5y ago
  These are age cohort averages. If you die of COVID despite being vaccinated, clearly the vaccine was 0% effective and early treatment could possibly have helped. Either way, 70% is not incredible in my book. The 95% from the booster will not last.
  - shapefrog 5y ago
    You are confusing the outcomes of 'serious illness' - which you presented numbers for, and 'death'. Yes you are correct to say if something is effective 999,999 in a million, it is 0% effective in the 1 person. As you specifically mention deaths, but present no information regarding it here is the UK data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween2januaryand2july2021 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsde... All cohorts: 51,281 total covid deaths in the 6 months Jan - July 2021. 640 of which had 2 doses of a vaccine.
    - incrudible 5y ago
      You picked a source that not age-stratified and also looks at a timeframe when many were not vaccinated in the first place. I can give you a source for deaths in the past few weeks in Israel, but only stratified between over/under 60: https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/what-do-new-israeli-data-say-about-effect-of-vaccines-boosters-vs-death-critical-severe-disease https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/what-do-new-israeli-d... The picture is similar: Efficacy of around 70% (two doses) and 95% (fresh booster) against death. This is far from "one in a million". If you age-stratified this data further, you would likely get better efficacy though.
      - shapefrog 5y ago
        Assume for the purpose every single one of the ~600 is old. Same outcome. Indeed leaving them in, according to your own source makes vaccines look worse than they are! Given how the large sample size etc is I am more than comfortable taking the UK unstratified data and clncluding the vaccines are effective. > Because of age confounding, it is crucial to stratify by age groups, and further to remove children from the <60yr group; otherwise Simpson's paradox makes vaccines look like they are not effective in protecting against COVID-19 deaths at all.
        incrudible 5y ago
        No matter how you twist and turn it, the vaccines are significantly less effective in the people who need it the most, to the point where a significant amount of deaths, in both absolue and relative terms, occur in the fully vaccinated. That means better options for treatment are still needed. That is the point I am making, nothing else.
        shapefrog 5y ago
        You are litterally making shit up by saying a significant amount of deaths, in both absolue and relative terms, occur in the fully vaccinated Best of luck to you on your propaganda campaign.