4 ms·
ES is the C in CQRS though. If you're using it for the Q too, then it's no wonder you'll quickly get in a bad way. It's specifically not designed for that.
by kitd 5y ago
ES is the C in CQRS though. If you're using it for the Q too, then it's no wonder you'll quickly get in a bad way. It's specifically not designed for that.
- deepanchor 5y agoAs I understand it, ES and CQRS are somewhat orthogonal concepts (although they are indeed often used together). It's perfectly legitimate to implement CQRS without using event sourcing at all. The only thing CQRS dictates is that a system's read models are separate from its write models.
- kitd 5y agoThat's very true, but the benefits of ES come on the write side of the equation. Expecting it to solve read-side problems will inevitably lead to disappointment.