3 ms·
Here's Sanger's blog post from 2019: https://larrysanger.org/2019/10/ksf/ https://larrysanger.org/2019/10/ksf/ > If you want to participate in the world’s larg
by bmarquez 5y ago
Here's Sanger's blog post from 2019: https://larrysanger.org/2019/10/ksf/ https://larrysanger.org/2019/10/ksf/
> If you want to participate in the world’s largest encyclopedia, you must collaborate with a shadowy group of anonymous amateurs and paid shills on exactly one article per topic. If you’re new, you won’t be treated very nicely. If you don’t play their strange game, you’ll be summarily dismissed. Like the social media giants, Wikipedia has become an arrogant and controlling oligarchy.
> Like Facebook, Wikipedia is also controlling its readers. It feeds them biased articles, exactly one per topic, does not let users give effective, independent feedback on articles (you’re forced to become a participant) or to rate articles. They have in a very real way centralized epistemic authority in the hands of an anonymous mob. This is worse than Facebook. At least with Facebook, Congress can call Mark Zuckerberg to testify. There isn’t anyone who is responsible for Wikipedia’s content. The situation is, in some ways, more dire than with Facebook, because you can’t effectively talk back to Wikipedia.