> because "if it is forbidden by authorities, it should be somehow true". Note that that is incorrect, and ironically demonstrates a unjustifiably high degree

> because "if it is forbidden by authorities, it should be somehow true". Note that that is incorrect, and ironically demonstrates a unjustifiably high degree of trust in authorities. Rather, if someone supports censoring something, it means that they believe that it[0]'s true. But that doesn't mean they're right - their revealed internal beliefs are no more infalliable than their externally claimed ones. 0: Technically, they believe that something in the general class of claims they're attempting to censor (eg some anti-vaxx claim, but not necessarily any of the specific ones that have actually been made) is true.