4 ms·

False analogy. They made a drug and are calling it a vaccine. That the ministry of truth changed what their definition of 'vaccine' is at the same time changes

False analogy. They made a drug and are calling it a vaccine. That the ministry of truth changed what their definition of 'vaccine' is at the same time changes nothing about reality.

oblio 5y ago
Ok, so why does it matter if it's a "drug" and not a "vaccine"? And by the way, J&J and Astra Zeneca <<are>> "vaccines", even by your silly definition. You're just being contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. As they say, don't make a mountain out of a mole hill.
- NaturalPhallacy 5y ago
  >Ok, so why does it matter if it's a "drug" and not a "vaccine"? Because they keep calling people who want to take the drug "anti-vaxxers" lumping them in with people who are against vaccines. I'm not anti-vaxxer, so it's a lie to call me one. I also am not interested in taking the anti-COVID drug. Not wanting to take the new, barely tested, anti-COVID drug does not make me an anti-vaxxer even if you change the definition of vaccine to include the anti-COVID drug. >You're just being contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. As they say, don't make a mountain out of a mole hill. No, I am not. People have died, and had their health permanently degraded from this anti-COVID drug. I'm weighing the risks of that against COVID. I'm at very low risk of serious illness from COVID, and unknown risk from the anti-COVID drug. So I'm not taking the drug. It's not "contrarian" and it's not "making a mountain out of a molehill" it's my body, my choice. I thing vaccines are amazing and I look forward to new ones. The anti-covid drug isn't one. It's that simple.
  - oblio 5y ago
    > And by the way, J&J and Astra Zeneca <<are>> "vaccines", even by your silly definition. Quoting myself to highlight the key comment. > It's not "contrarian" and it's not "making a mountain out of a molehill" it's my body, my choice. You're just being malicious at this point.

False analogy. They made a drug and are calling it a vaccine. That the ministry of truth changed what their definition of 'vaccine' is at the same time changes nothing about reality.

oblio 5y ago

Ok, so why does it matter if it's a "drug" and not a "vaccine"? And by the way, J&J and Astra Zeneca <<are>> "vaccines", even by your silly definition. You're just being contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. As they say, don't make a mountain out of a mole hill.

NaturalPhallacy 5y ago
>Ok, so why does it matter if it's a "drug" and not a "vaccine"? Because they keep calling people who want to take the drug "anti-vaxxers" lumping them in with people who are against vaccines. I'm not anti-vaxxer, so it's a lie to call me one. I also am not interested in taking the anti-COVID drug. Not wanting to take the new, barely tested, anti-COVID drug does not make me an anti-vaxxer even if you change the definition of vaccine to include the anti-COVID drug. >You're just being contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. As they say, don't make a mountain out of a mole hill. No, I am not. People have died, and had their health permanently degraded from this anti-COVID drug. I'm weighing the risks of that against COVID. I'm at very low risk of serious illness from COVID, and unknown risk from the anti-COVID drug. So I'm not taking the drug. It's not "contrarian" and it's not "making a mountain out of a molehill" it's my body, my choice. I thing vaccines are amazing and I look forward to new ones. The anti-covid drug isn't one. It's that simple.
- oblio 5y ago
  > And by the way, J&J and Astra Zeneca <<are>> "vaccines", even by your silly definition. Quoting myself to highlight the key comment. > It's not "contrarian" and it's not "making a mountain out of a molehill" it's my body, my choice. You're just being malicious at this point.