> "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic." Not only is it misused, the

> "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic." Not only is it misused, the doctrine Holmes established was walked back (by Holmes himself!) and hasn't been the standard since 1969. https://www.popehat.com/2012/09/19/three-generations-of-a-hackneyed-apologia-for-censorship-are-enough/ https://www.popehat.com/2012/09/19/three-generations-of-a-ha...