3 ms·
The whole arch64 and docker is my point. I use docker to abstract that pain so I don’t have to care about (to a certain degree). If all of sudden, I need to wor
by aynyc 5y ago
The whole arch64 and docker is my point. I use docker to abstract that pain so I don’t have to care about (to a certain degree). If all of sudden, I need to worry about my underlying arch, then I might as well run on VMs. For lambda, it’s more of a micro-OS anyway than a generic docker container.
- monocasa 5y agoDocker explicitly doesn't abstract aarch64. That's why it took tons of work to build up the ecosystem this far and even then and still you'll come across public images that aren't multiarch.
- viraptor 5y agoI'm not sure what you mean by not caring about underlying arch. With docker you use an arch-specific image. The author may transparently provide multiple arch versions of the image, but I wouldn't call it abstracting. (not in the sense fat-binaries do for example) Specifically, if you then make your own app image on top of the base one, it will again need to be built for each architecture separately.
- detaro 5y agoHow does docker abstract arch64 for you?