4 ms·
* HORRIBLE * * UGH * * Also, both un-DRMd formats are separate? * I don't see what's wrong with the title page and the dedication page... It does its job. I ad
by stephth 15y ago
* HORRIBLE * * UGH * * Also, both un-DRMd formats are separate? *
I don't see what's wrong with the title page and the dedication page... It does its job. I admit that the Kindle sample could use some actual meat, but the samples on the website look good to me. I mean, you sound like it attacked you with a knife. Also, it's a 3 dollar book. If you like it so much that you'll want to re-read it in your next generation ebook, would $3 extra bucks be that unacceptable?
I'm curious. Was there really nothing positive worth noting to you? And if so, why bother commenting? Isn't it more beneficial to focus our energies on things that we enjoy and are excited about?
- scott_s 15y agoThe title page and dedication page do not give me a taste of the book - which is what I want from a sample. I want the table of contents and a few pages of one of the chapters to get a feel for what the book is like. That's what I look at when I pick up a book in the store. Note that only looking at positive comments is harmful. wccrawford's criticism about the sample is important, and changing it should help sell more copies.
- stephth 15y agoYour comment on the sample is constructive and I agree with it ("the Kindle sample could use some actual meat"), but I don't find "The free preview on Amazon is HORRIBLE. The title page and the dedication page? UGH." to be conveying what you said or to be constructive.
- scott_s 15y agoWhat I said and the sentence you quoted have the same content. Mine was just a nicer way of saying it.
- stephth 15y agoI suppose your own interpretation of it had the same content - maybe you're familiar enough with wccrawford and can guess what he's thinking - but objectively they don't. HORRIBLE and UGH were dropped without an actual explanation, and you comment doesn't just sound nicer: you explained how to improve the sample.
- scott_s 15y agoLet me put it this way: I was able to read his comment and recognize that he and I agreed, despite the fact that I don't know him.
- stephth 15y agoGreat, maybe then you can also enlighten me on what's so deeply wrong with the title and dedication page? It can't be about it being the only content of the sample, the main content in there is the introduction to the book.
- scott_s 15y agoI missed that entirely - I saw the top of the dedication page and assumed it was all dedication page, like most books. I think most people will do the same. That intro, though, is a tell, not a show. I want to sample some pages further into the book to see if the promises made in the intro are fulfilled.
- stephth 15y agoLooks like we were talking about two different things. wccrawford was talking about the preview, while we were referring to the "sample"... <sigh>.
- wccrawford 15y agoYou're right. I didn't bother with the downloadable sample because I assumed it would be the same as the 'look inside!' preview on Amazon.